Im sorry but the only thing you can call them is a traitor. And yes a spy as no doubt he has given you information. You can try and spin it any way you like, but you and your co leaders condoned, approved, and participated in dealing with spies and traitors.
Also as blackpest said there are avenues for leaving which would have meant handing over internals, but i see you ignored him.
You are really pathetic, as if a player of yours left and handed off cities in your core to 2 enemy alliances, you would be crying bloody murder
I don't care if you want to see my wall, i have nothing to hide, and clearly not a troop killer or i would be higher in the bp ranking
We have almost never forcefully internalized someone, at most 3-4 times in this alliances history(Since spikemike left several months back). Every internal is from someone who makes their own decision to leave.
I will ask every other leader or player from alliances not from the arrogant noobs.
If 2 of your players suddenly left, joined noobs, and planned handoffs in your core with noobs timing support right after the CS lands for the hand offs, would you not call them traitors?
You certainly would, no doubt about it.
I don't care if you want to see my wall, i have nothing to hide, and clearly not a troop killer or i would be higher in the bp ranking
Alright, I just want to answer a few people (not DV though as he doesn't listen).
About Erik and canibalisation, the problem is that when haina was proven to canibalise, both DV and shaz and a couple of others called him a fake fighter and all of that, they also included the rest of Noobs in their name calling, saying that most of us if not all canibalised. This is where the problems come. We have proof that Erik canibalised yet DV, shaz and co are not condemning his actions and still calling him a legend, shaz even went as far as saying that it was a BP gaining strategy (just if Erik did it though).
We are not the ones calling Erik a legend, it is mostly shaz and MGGA.Noobs have to get up with this,you wanna try to cover you lose with what ever you say Erik did!Damn, i am so speachless,about calling him a legend,everyone is free to call him as he.she wants,dont think it can bother you?No?How about i call you a legend?You gonna get more serious than?So less words and more fights,we can decide whenever we( i mean myself here)call you a legend or not
I would remaind you that when WW starts Turtles isnt going to be the oponent you gonna tracking.At last that is what i see,7 mil alliance you think gonna winn this server?Than Erik is an legend .But if you wanna compare a fight with the broken glass than trump would'nt winn the elections right.We are not the ones calling Erik a legend, it is mostly shaz and MGGA.
We are also not trying to cover up haina canibalising.
Imagine it like so:
You break a glass and get scolded by your parents.
A while later your brother breaks a glass but even if you have proof that your brother was the one who broke the glass your parents don't say anything, instead they scold you again for trying to cover up you breaking the glass.
You would find it unfair right?
I would remaind you that when WW starts Turtles isnt going to be the oponent you gonna tracking.At last that is what i see,7 mil alliance you think gonna winn this server?Than Erik is an legend .But if you wanna compare a fight with the broken glass than trump would'nt winn the elections right.
And we shall quote this back again. Because is much more relevant to this thread as far as I know.
You may not be a troop killer. But I think you're a simmer, too embarrassed to reveal your wall. Am I wrong? Post it then
Im sorry but the only thing you can call them is a traitor. And yes a spy as no doubt he has given you information. You can try and spin it any way you like, but you and your co leaders condoned, approved, and participated in dealing with spies and traitors.
Also as blackpest said there are avenues for leaving which would have meant handing over internals, but i see you ignored him.
You are really pathetic, as if a player of yours left and handed off cities in your core to 2 enemy alliances, you would be crying bloody murder
I don't care if you want to see my wall, i have nothing to hide, and clearly not a troop killer or i would be higher in the bp ranking
We have almost never forcefully internalized someone, at most 3-4 times in this alliances history(Since spikemike left several months back). Every internal is from someone who makes their own decision to leave.
I will ask every other leader or player from alliances not from the arrogant noobs.
If 2 of your players suddenly left, joined noobs, and planned handoffs in your core with noobs timing support right after the CS lands for the hand offs, would you not call them traitors?
You certainly would, no doubt about it.
Yes please,this constant essay typing is tiring.Just post your wall and be done with itDeus just post your wall
Yes please,this constant essay typing is tiring.Just post your wall and be done with it
To answer your question (although I am not up to date on the situation) yes of course I would call them traitors. However, I can only go off what you are saying, but given that to be true, yes.
But tbh, that is not what this thread is about. POST THE WALL
Deus bring this to 'The Trash Talk'
This thread is about posting your wall