DeletedUser54360
Guest
Eyes are hurting to see me at 3rd place
YOU will always be my No 1 WE all know you are simply taking a step back before hurtling forward again ..
Last edited by a moderator:
Eyes are hurting to see me at 3rd place
lets do a top 12 players instead of alliances to spice it up abit
1. Witchunter General - Talks alot but backs it up with his play good player - Swim
2. Gregismighty - shot up the rankings but with a bp rank of 29th with his cities (gold), dont no much about him or his alliance soooo lets go with - swim
3. LionfromNorth - seems like hes having some fun after rimmers/pigs failed merge, looks as if hes having some fun in ocean 56 from what i hear of his 26 double bp's hes very scary - swim
4. lethal-bacon - very funny guy - swim
5. eastern boy - who? - sink
6. xxcharlie199xx - where do u even start with this player, first of all the name (2/10) the best bit about it is 199, but give this man a passionate population and hes happy. Points wise he seems to lose more cities to his alliance than anyone else he cant be very popular. Have to say though his profile is very good - sink
7. hainamiss - anyone with his myth numbers u dont want to be against - swim
8. socratice - very quiet but very active - swim
9. abu - no nothing about him but seems to keep a good steady rate in points - swim
10. skip - he kills olu for fun, has been shooting up bp ranks - swim
11. nebu - same as abu
12. king soos - noob, 3-0 up vs charlie though
Wrong tab, if you want to know the good players look at the Attacker ranking and not the player rankings. Fighter too if you want to but points mean smit all.
DizzLJoe Strength And Courage are useless without also Purpose and Direction.. ...
BP is useful as a guide to the internal strategy of each group or how various wars are going . It can indicate under OR over fighting . The figures have to be considered in context - which would be great if that context itself was not constantly shifting.
I think the key measure over all is cities controlled. BUT BP has to be considered in line with that .
Wrong tab, if you want to know the good players look at the Attacker ranking and not the player rankings. Fighter too if you want to but points mean smit all.
If you keep posting stuff like this and not always the garbage that you MM to other alliances then I might unblock you. Not arguing about the way this game is meant to be played though as there are multiple ways and none is better than the other. But in my eyes the only thing that matters is Attacker and Fighter ranking. I have seen too many top 10 players who are just glorified big simmer that do nothing and just golded or ressed their slots. If you cannot win the WWs and are two short then you want those kinda players with the highest attacker and Fighter ranking to lead you to victory. Plus, fighters and attackers can kill alliances small or big. Building WW is good and dandy but if you cannot make it till then it is of no use if you got big cities with nothing behind it.
ODIN are decent? maybe in future they also join Savage Gang like most others ? LOL,
Really agree with that. Was exactly the same on x6 server. Players are not here to take risk, they are here not to lose any city, that's why they pact with 90% of the biggest alliances. So there are wars between 400 vs 400 players...what is this really.