DeletedUser
Guest
more troops are bad, more attacks are bad, i'll keep that in mind.
depends on the time frame you look at it over. short term its very good thing, walk all over everyone, easy battles and you grow fast. long term, well you run out of targets fast, no good players to fight and everyone gets bored and ethier gets slack,fight each other or leave the game.if you massively recruit good players it means you have massive amounts of good players, bad thing?
Well, having massive players if you have experienced founders and leaders capable to plan, organize, control, monitor, and execute alliance activities is an advantage, however, once you overlooked and failed to lead them is disasterif you massively recruit good players it means you have massive amounts of good players, bad thing?
if you think they have a monopoly on anything you are mistaken, there are other. powers.depends on the time frame you look at it over. short term its very good thing, walk all over everyone, easy battles and you grow fast. long term, well you run out of targets fast, no good players to fight and everyone gets bored and ethier gets slack,fight each other or leave the game.
i think for the long term fun of this world having alot of the good players in 3 joined alliances is a bad thing but hay each to there own. everyone can do as they please.
if you think they have a monopoly on anything you are mistaken, there are other. powers.
if you think they have a monopoly on anything you are mistaken, there are other. powers.
yyyyaaawwwnnn!!!!(D)
guys are there no update on this top 12 so that there will be more interesting things to read?rather than putting all focus to warlords?
~ He says not posting a top 12