DeletedUser41523
Guest
So we're 102 worlds and almost eight years into this game. I'm curious, what does everyone thing was the best team that was ever assembled on a world for revolt and conquest?
I'd say one of the Venoms for Conq. You're def right on fast. But who would win in a head to head?
Syndicate relies too much on world being slow and their heavy golders building shiny 10k cities and founding and insta building colonies to 5-8k pts within first days, while other people struggle to have 4k cities when BP ends, so Syndicate dominates in lower speed worlds, in speed 3 or 4 revolt, i would say Syndicate would not be able to do much against such machine as EN of course lead by their original leaders..
The last world that The Syndicate played in was Emporion and we dominated from day one......around 80 players against the entire server. There was only one player that had a 10k city coming out of BP for TS with the majority averaging around 3-4k. No more gold was being thrown around by TS than the top 10 players from each of the other alliances. We do play slow because there is more strategy in a slower paced world....the whole it's a marathon and not a sprint concept, but we have also always said we would move up in speed with the right teams in place to challenge us.
I am not aware of "more strategy" part in slower paced worlds, because i play speed 3 or 4 only.
While you were getting ready to play higher speed worlds, elite revolt premades are slowly stopping to exist, EN most probably wont be assembled again..
Besides i thought you guys realized after 3-4 worlds won that no speed 1 revolt team can challenge yo your crew.. speed 2 is more less the same in my opinion.. a lot more teams in general are formed for faster paced worlds..
I'd say move up. If only for a world to shake the whole slow speed joke.
I'd say move up. If only for a world to shake the whole slow speed joke.