DeletedUser21774
Guest
I'm partial to TRIAD for conquest. 4 reasons.
1. I've never won with a non-Triad team, and no team I've been on or lost to was as good (since 2012). Nightmares of Elyssium might have been close but that was so far back I cannot compare.
2. Another reason is that every world we have played in we have done very well. Ok, so we got Master in Athens (not victor), and both the 4/7 award in Oropos and Zancle. The top 4 in Athens were harder than any top teams I have seen and any of them would win if they were assembled in any of the non-Triad worlds I have played in.
3. The third indicator in favor of Triad, is that we have front line players always seeking out that edge. One of our core leaders invented the "oracle of zancle" and no doubt would respond to new challenges arising in future worlds.
4. Some of Triad's main competitors (including detractors) are writing me to see when we are playing again, because they want to be on the team.
1. I've never won with a non-Triad team, and no team I've been on or lost to was as good (since 2012). Nightmares of Elyssium might have been close but that was so far back I cannot compare.
2. Another reason is that every world we have played in we have done very well. Ok, so we got Master in Athens (not victor), and both the 4/7 award in Oropos and Zancle. The top 4 in Athens were harder than any top teams I have seen and any of them would win if they were assembled in any of the non-Triad worlds I have played in.
3. The third indicator in favor of Triad, is that we have front line players always seeking out that edge. One of our core leaders invented the "oracle of zancle" and no doubt would respond to new challenges arising in future worlds.
4. Some of Triad's main competitors (including detractors) are writing me to see when we are playing again, because they want to be on the team.
Last edited by a moderator: