DeletedUser
Guest
Maybe 2/3 Months not much longer if it is still around by then
Heh, that's pretty sad considering the first worlds lasted a good 2 years. =/
Maybe 2/3 Months not much longer if it is still around by then
You jumped the gun there a bit.. Don't de-rep someone so easily without hearing their counter-argument against your accusations
So with the new world settings coming out and it looking like Venom is easily the most organized alliance here as of right now how long do you give the world before it dies? I personally have it at 1.5 months.
ImPreeetySure said:*Tries to top 4 core oceans*
*Gets Bored and quits*
I've seen that happen before on Xi so I give them 4-8 months before they do that.
Agree to some extent.
Well, there used to be a day when there were 10 worlds each one filled with at least 20000 players and next worlds would open in 2-3 months apart, no one had the rush to go into a new world, yeah I am talking about 2010 (Iota, Kappa, Gamma...), but seems Innogames has a resolution to make it to 100 worlds at the end of 2013, still have nt figured out the reason myself.
But the point is We are not looking for the crown above our names, staying till the end of a world at the cost of simming is not what our team is after, we might get bored, we might leave, but it does nt mean it has to happen all the time, it depends on many factors.
Seriously why 61 worlds each with 2000 to 3000 players (half inactive)? :supermad:
Ok so I jumped to a conclusion, really. He changed his "opinion" after my post, seems like he understood what his words in the first post looked like and then changed in second post i a bit less pessimistic opinion on Paros.
But if you think I was wrong in any way to react the way I did, just read his original post again,
1.5 months he gave to the world! Is that nice to say to other players in Paros. "Hey guys and ladies, you are doing a good job farming, building and staff, but listen all your hard is for nothing because this world will be dead in 1.5 months, yea sorry". That is just nice, but hey respect for enemies and allies in resent times in grepo is becoming a commodity anyway so I understand this "optimistic" way thinking.
EDIT:
PS
de reping someone without giving a name tells more about that person that the one you de reped.
I always sign with my de rep to someone, but hey seems I am a weirdo around here
looks to me like somebody has never played a conquest server for very longits a revolt world which needs more skill teamwork and effort.
To each his own but I started on Gamma. I just figured ways to spread out defenses easier in Revolt. Though I have a few tricks for conquest also.nod, you must've also started on a revolt world
conquest has WAY more tactical options, and you need to be more active to time both clearing and support for a siege. to me revolt is the one that's much more smash and grab