DeletedUser
Guest
Dear Innogames,
I am very worried. I fear Hyperboria is going to fall below the 300 active player rule and be shut down.
I understand why the rule exists: not enough players, and the world isnt worth the time...but here its different. This is the only world without conquest/revolt. As an adult with a full time job and many responsibilities I cannot excel in the normal worlds where I can lose cities, but I love this game and I want to play!
I ask this: please make an exception to the 300 player rule for Hyperborea, Or at least create another "no conquest/revolt" world in its place when it does get shut down.
In defense of my plea: I have spent $159.95 on this world alone. I am sure others have spent money on this world (maybe not quite as much as me) who would be unable (or unwilling) to play any other world. If I play a game, I want to be able to excel, despite my severe time handicap.
ro:
Sincerely,
-manoleas
I am very worried. I fear Hyperboria is going to fall below the 300 active player rule and be shut down.
I understand why the rule exists: not enough players, and the world isnt worth the time...but here its different. This is the only world without conquest/revolt. As an adult with a full time job and many responsibilities I cannot excel in the normal worlds where I can lose cities, but I love this game and I want to play!
I ask this: please make an exception to the 300 player rule for Hyperborea, Or at least create another "no conquest/revolt" world in its place when it does get shut down.
In defense of my plea: I have spent $159.95 on this world alone. I am sure others have spent money on this world (maybe not quite as much as me) who would be unable (or unwilling) to play any other world. If I play a game, I want to be able to excel, despite my severe time handicap.
ro:
Sincerely,
-manoleas