DeletedUser2413
Guest
I tell you the smartphone killed more than people reading books on the train and eye contact and actual human interaction.
There could be some potentially EPIC battles over some higher profile cities in the later stages of the world.
The thing is, players will always find something to complain about in "Gripe"olis... it's not like the world has even started. Have you considered that while it is obviously going to change dynamics. That maybe change isn't always a bad thing.
This game is shrinking for a reason, maybe people have grown up and aren't 16 anymore, maybe the EN servers have changed as the international dynamic has changed with that, maybe people don't want to spend 24/7 sitting in front of their computer or hovering by their smartphone. (since that changed with the game and we now have an app where it never existed)
Who knows how this change is actually going to play out until we play it. Maybe it'll be fun... maybe people will be able to still enjoy their summer a little bit more without hovering over Grep, one thing for certain is it will give alliances a larger window to make some massive breaks. There could be some potentially EPIC battles over some higher profile cities in the later stages of the world.
To me that doesn't sound terrible, it actually sounds like it could be pretty fun to me. Who knows. Only time will tell.
Yeah but those epic battles will be decided in the first 2 hrs of the siege 99% of the time once the server is a month old so a 12 hr siege time doesn't really change that. The only difference that a 12 hr siege makes is that we have 10 hours of sitting around waiting before support can get recycled into the next siege. It's boring.
nope dont think a single person is complaining about the alliance capthe problem isnt the duration, its the alliance cap matched with the time, if it were lets say 60 cap im sure everyone would be sweet, but at the beginning everyone wants d
Disagree with that, with lower caps alot more sister and academy alliances happen on lower cap worlds than bigger which also makes ww more messier than usual bigger caps.Alliance cap has 0 impact on the game only on the standings.
Tho an alliance cap of 0 would definitely have an impact on the gameAlliance cap has 0 impact on the game only on the standings.
MOST seems to be a few ppl complaining hereSo they aren't going to do anything to fix what most want changed? Do we all submit tickets to do this done or
14 people liked the first post. I wasn't even aware 14 people read the external forums when all I see are the same 5 people posting every time, so yes MOST seem to like the idea from the sample we have here. There are 3 or 4 people complaining about us complaining, so yes when I see 14 out of 18 people supporting an idea, that generally is considered "MOST".MOST seems to be a few ppl complaining here
And since this wasn't announced as THE summer speed world (that could have been 107), your assumptions and whining are just that
No mod has responded b/c there is nothing to which to respond... the settings are the settings
disagree when it comes to WW it is very importantAlliance cap has 0 impact on the game only on the standings.
grepointel current has 3k+ ppl playing 10914 people liked the first post. I wasn't even aware 14 people read the external forums when all I see are the same 5 people posting every time, so yes MOST seem to like the idea from the sample we have here. There are 3 or 4 people complaining about us complaining, so yes when I see 14 out of 18 people supporting an idea, that generally is considered "MOST".
3000?!!! Have you ever seen mere then 30 active people on the externals?grepointel current has 3k+ ppl playing 109
14/3000 is not most
i see a ton of likes for all the posts telling you to put on your big boy pants and man up
just b/c you are the loudest whiner doesn't make your opinion the most valid