I don't think your a bad player... And your right, people do make mistakes. But I was just diggin on you a bit. LOL. If I made the mistake, I would take the hits, all part of the fun. But as far as Conq in your core, in time my friend, in time. I do admit, that conquer attempt was a bit weak, but it was more of a training exercise. When we want to hit a city, it won't be advertised as well as that one was. But then I gotta bring up the conq attempt by your player yesterday with a 10 hours CS attempt. It was funny, he was met with a wall of Birms that took everything he threw at it with minimal loss. So yeah, we both have some beginners, but the diff is, we are teaching ours to play. In time, we will have twice the active members with double the cities. Seen it all happen before in other worlds, so I'm not going on wishes and assumptions here. This method has been tried and tested and will result in our alliance remaining elite.
Hitting cities close to our CS during their off line times is smart game play. Why would I send a CS ten hours out to your core, like your player did, during the player's on line time? Does that sound like good game play? Nope. I will stick to our methods and risk the fact that you won't be impressed. LOL. We will be just fine, keep underestimating our smaller players. There is many reasons they give us an advantage. But I won't share those here. If your peeps can't figure it out, the war will go much more quickly in our favor.
We don't want RELENTLESS to look bad, we just want to have a fun open forum discussion on the progress of the war. Happy hunting bro...