DeletedUser38224
Guest
I don't really see how it should be illegal; All it is is civil Discussion, That is being conducted in the proper section of the forum, Off-topic.
You are clearly over thinking this.To be honest, I'm not really Interested in debating this any further with you; I've made a solid enough case to convince myself that God exists, I truly am sorry I wasn't able to influence your decision that he doesn't exist. Maybe these two Intellectual Heavyweights you've sent your argument to will do so. My only hope is that this Hypothetical third party might read my posts and be touched to not stop following God.
In your example we can compare:
- Your cliff to Not following God
- The Article that Claims your car can Fly to Pebbles Original Post
- The Source that says your car can't fly to Common sense
- The Common sense Monster, or whatever the hell the incarnation of common sense is to God
So, In your situation, The Common sense Monster has to add something in to Common sense to Prevent this Dumbass article writer from Telling you that your Car can fly.
Now, the common sense monster Had previously said that you were allowed to Drive your car off the cliff, It's just that you would Die, And that he won't attempt to Prevent you from Driving your car off the Cliff if you want to.
If He goes and Modifies Common sense to stop this article Writer from writing the article, and in effect stops you from being informed about Your car supposedly being able to fly, He is Breaking his Promise.
You are clearly over thinking this. Look, If I give you five dollars to never speak to me again and you never speak to me again have I taken away your free will in influencing your choice?
So, In your situation, The Common sense Monster has to add something in to Common sense to Prevent this Dumbass article writer from Telling you that your Car can fly.
Now, the common sense monster Had previously said that you were allowed to Drive your car off the cliff, It's just that you would Die, And that he won't attempt to Prevent you from Driving your car off the Cliff if you want to.
If He goes and Modifies Common sense to stop this article Writer from writing the article, and in effect stops you from being informed about Your car supposedly being able to fly, He is Breaking his Promise.
It seems like you're just saying random stuff now To be honest.
I'm not sure how to make this clearer to you
If I influence you to make a decision am I taking your free will away. There. As straight forward as possible.
God knowing all including all possible futures would know exactly how to have the article not exist.
He's not changing common sense. He couldn't anyway. He is finding a way to make you not read the article. He can predict anything so he can literally set it up for the beginning of creation so you don't read the article in one possible future.
Think of it like one of those the wind cause a rock to Fall which causes me to get knocked out which made me go to hospital where I met your mother. Yes there is no choice there but the concept of one random event leading to something else is the same. God can set up the world to make that wind not happen and make this reality not happen. Same way he can set up the world to stop you from reading some random newspaper article.
I'm not really interested into Responding to every Harebrained Metaphor you come up with that has Absolutely no relevance to the current discussion.
If God Prevents you from not believing in him, he is breaking his promise. I'm not sure how you are not getting this.
To all nonbelievers http://rawforbeauty.com/blog/12-year-old-girl-paints-heaven-child-prodigy-wvideo.html
also there is a true story called heaven is for real about a 12 year old boy who knew things he could not have possibly known. He saw one of the painting of jesus this girl drew and said that is the man he saw in heaven.
To be honest, I'm not really Interested in debating this any further with you; I've made a solid enough case to convince myself that God exists, I truly am sorry I wasn't able to influence your decision that he doesn't exist. Maybe these two Intellectual Heavyweights you've sent your argument to will do so. My only hope is that this Hypothetical third party might read my posts and be touched to not stop following God.
In your example we can compare:
- Your cliff to Not following God
- The Article that Claims your car can Fly to Pebbles Original Post
- The Source that says your car can't fly to Common sense
- The Common sense Monster, or whatever the hell the incarnation of common sense is to God
So, In your situation, The Common sense Monster has to add something in to Common sense to Prevent this Dumbass article writer from Telling you that your Car can fly.
Now, the common sense monster Had previously said that you were allowed to Drive your car off the cliff, It's just that you would Die, And that he won't attempt to Prevent you from Driving your car off the Cliff if you want to.
If He goes and Modifies Common sense to stop this article Writer from writing the article, and in effect stops you from being informed about Your car supposedly being able to fly, He is Breaking his Promise.
how is this sort of thing not illegal on this forum
I'm not really interested into Responding to every Harebrained Metaphor you come up with that has Absolutely no relevance to the current discussion.
Convinced yourself using poor arguments and bad logic? Then I completely agree in having no desire to continue the conversation with you - especially since once you convinced yourself you backed away.
Reminiscent of my past experiences with other Christians. How sad that I would receive your pity instead of your counter.
It's not that I convinced Myself of anything before "backing away". My Beliefs never changed, You have failed to convince me that God Doesn't Exist. Perhaps the quoted Post was poorly written in this manner, since what I really meant was that I had discounted your argument against the existence of God.
Why shouldn't you receive My pity? I am going to Heaven when I die and you are going to Hell.
You are in my prayers.