DeletedUser
Guest
There was a LoC over here? Another Delta influence, perhaps?
Looking at how things stand, I'd actually say MG as Huns. Less members, but bigger members and how they work (a greater degree of autonomy than most) and their general attitude matches up my experience of the Huns. Not most people's, though. That would make EtD the DoA, because DoA was more organized, still strong players, but not as strong. When I say organized, by the by, I mean coordinated, not that MG are more vulnerable than EtD.
Its not really a valid comparison, I know. Huns/DoA coalition made up about half the points of the top12, where there was a lot more established alliances on that world. Likewise, there are four of them here in Pi, all top class, where there were two (three if you want to count my old alliance) that were intimidating and three (I s'pose) that were far less so.
Would you call AC the Huns here? No. The comparison there is far too much a stretch. A DoA? Maybe, but I don't see AD as being near as organized. They should have waited, in my opinion, before bothering with an academy. They're now limiting their own conquers while providing morale blows every time their opponents take a city from their academy.
I'm probably being far too honest in my analysis for the public forums, but luckily the points I've made will be lost on a lot of people because they don't know the Delta alliances as well.
Onto our own world though, anyone want to do a new rating? We've had a few names changing on the rankings and I hear there might be more change to come in the next couple of days. Has anyone's impressions been changed since they posted, or haven't yet? C'mon, this stuff is like gold to diplomats
And yeah, I'll post an update of my own thoughts later today. Why not?
Finton.
Looking at how things stand, I'd actually say MG as Huns. Less members, but bigger members and how they work (a greater degree of autonomy than most) and their general attitude matches up my experience of the Huns. Not most people's, though. That would make EtD the DoA, because DoA was more organized, still strong players, but not as strong. When I say organized, by the by, I mean coordinated, not that MG are more vulnerable than EtD.
Its not really a valid comparison, I know. Huns/DoA coalition made up about half the points of the top12, where there was a lot more established alliances on that world. Likewise, there are four of them here in Pi, all top class, where there were two (three if you want to count my old alliance) that were intimidating and three (I s'pose) that were far less so.
Would you call AC the Huns here? No. The comparison there is far too much a stretch. A DoA? Maybe, but I don't see AD as being near as organized. They should have waited, in my opinion, before bothering with an academy. They're now limiting their own conquers while providing morale blows every time their opponents take a city from their academy.
I'm probably being far too honest in my analysis for the public forums, but luckily the points I've made will be lost on a lot of people because they don't know the Delta alliances as well.
Onto our own world though, anyone want to do a new rating? We've had a few names changing on the rankings and I hear there might be more change to come in the next couple of days. Has anyone's impressions been changed since they posted, or haven't yet? C'mon, this stuff is like gold to diplomats
And yeah, I'll post an update of my own thoughts later today. Why not?
Finton.