Shuri2060
Strategos
Not sure what Bacon is referring to about me... I believe a feedback thread is for feedback and I generally try to post constructive feedback if there's something I think can be improved. I prefer not to post 'That's great!' on everything I think is good - this is not a vote or something like that.
Everyone can use LMDs, but I feel they do help counter golding even so. I think it adds a layer of strategy the not-so-good spenders would struggle against. Eg. you can't just blindly dump resources to gold break every low morale siege - you're going to find yourself behind in the long run if you do that.
I also think its true that siege morale gives an alliance with fewer players a better chance to win. Yes, this game favors larger alliances regardless of gamemode, but I'd argue siege morale gives more opportunity to the underdogs. It makes it harder to just rely on sheer numbers (there's an extra layer of strategy).
That said, I don't think these pros outweigh the cons of siege morale.
Everyone can use LMDs, but I feel they do help counter golding even so. I think it adds a layer of strategy the not-so-good spenders would struggle against. Eg. you can't just blindly dump resources to gold break every low morale siege - you're going to find yourself behind in the long run if you do that.
I also think its true that siege morale gives an alliance with fewer players a better chance to win. Yes, this game favors larger alliances regardless of gamemode, but I'd argue siege morale gives more opportunity to the underdogs. It makes it harder to just rely on sheer numbers (there's an extra layer of strategy).
That said, I don't think these pros outweigh the cons of siege morale.
Last edited: