DeletedUser
Guest
Surely its more fun and much more satisfying when you managed to keep alliances A B C at bay with diplomacy whilst you fight out a war with alliance D, and win? OR with diplomacy you egg alliance A on to attack alliance B, when they've wasted their troops you come in and take out both?
Doesn't this idea force alliances to play a certain way? Doesn't it remove tactics rather than add to the game? Doesn't this idea remove the need for good diplmacy?
Am I missing something?
Nef
Doesn't this idea force alliances to play a certain way? Doesn't it remove tactics rather than add to the game? Doesn't this idea remove the need for good diplmacy?
Am I missing something?
Nef
Last edited by a moderator: