On a personal note: Over the years since en 9 I have seen a disturbing pattern of lack of action from Inno to various forms of skulduggery (if it is not in a form which directly eats into revenue) which has cost me great team mates and cost Inno paying customers. Misguided attempts to protect the reputation of the game? Covering for mates? I don't know the answer to that.
These are just the comments of a pure genius. BraveLittleToaster here - one of the ones you are assuredly referring to as "that bunch with the attack bot in 34." Yeah, no one in our alliance cheated, ever. Despite your literal hundreds of reports you sent in, not a one was banned. Why? Because no cheating was found. You are just too immature to acknowledge the fact that we, as an alliance of 10, were dominating you. We were better players, in a more organized and active alliance, with a vastly superior understanding of the game, plain and simple. I'm not sure what world you live in but in the world I live in finding something for sale on the internet does not equate to any sort of "proof" that someone else has it. I've found a lot of stuff for sale on the internet. It would be awesome if by just seeing it for sale means I own it. But sadly, that doesn't appear to be the case. Maybe those players that left due to their "understandable frustrations" might have stuck around if you had the level of maturity that comes with accepting that there are just better players than you out there and tried to learn something in the process. Too bad, so sad.
It is your lie, kellyanne conway, you can tell it any way you want too.
No one is that good AND that lucky, every single time.
You covered it well and got away with it, I guess some sort of kudos are in order for that. But you might have made it look a little less obvious. Maybe throw in a "late" 1.5 sec snipe now and then. LOL
The "proof" was that such a thing exists when Inno swore to the high heavens that it did not, could not.
There was not a doubt in my mind but if there had been, your post here would have dispelled it.
Lol reading Miknel has inspired me to comment here.
Yes Miks mini 34 team was good. Experienced and skilled and therefore able to handle their number disadvantage very well. There are many legitimate ways to ensure brilliant timing every time if you are willing to invest the time and effort and set up your cities properly.
The best timer i ever knew could get 7 chances on each anchor. If he sent say ls, that means once with slow trans and once alone - 14 chances. I can't do that but using the planner i can get 5 per anchor so thats still potentially 10 chances. Starting 10 secs before and finishing 10 secs after is a 20 sec window, since the anti timer allows 10 secs either way this is really a 40 sec window for timing. If you have 10 chances with each city you can see that its not hard to get close time every time.
I once played a world where all the top fighters used this system. Towards the end when we all had loads cities only same sec/1 sec was good enough so we cancelled attacks/support that did not meet with that criteria. If you looked at an incoming conversion it looked impossible unless you understood what was happening. Needless to say a lot were reported as cheats but from the cs sent to me I could tell it was trial and error.
Yep, I heard the same "explanation" for a couple months from some of the ones who grew frustrated after it became obvious,, and obvious that there would be no action on it.
And similar outraged denials from gold abusers over the years. LOL
Believe as you wish. As I said, the action in 34 was just a sideshow. Unhelpful but not a major factor.