DeletedUser8396
Guest
Wasnt random at all. We had legitimate intelligence saying their leaders were there, so we went in.
- Status
Wasnt random at all. We had legitimate intelligence saying their leaders were there, so we went in.
DeletedUser
Guest
That's called rape.
DeletedUser8396
Guest
Wow...
DeletedUser
Guest
ROFL!
You mean intelligence derived from torture and deceit?
Also just cause their leaders are there does not warrant an invasion of that country, and the disruption of their rights.
That country by law is equal to the USA, and so should be treated with respect. The USA has shown only contempt.
DeletedUser8396
Guest
Again with the torture and deceit argument? Must I repaste all my sources showing that most major countries use torture?
If the Tower of London and Westminster Abbey were crashed into as an act of terror, would England sit by? Wouldnt you want them to do EVERYTHING possible to stop those that did it?
Or would you want them to sit idly by and say, "Eh, maybe they wont do it again."
We did what was necessary to get the bad guys gone. Or would you rather Osama Bin Laden continue to roam around merrily?
DeletedUser
Guest
England is arguable one of the best defended places in the World, more secure than America due to our gun regulations.
England does not use torture.
Also we have anti-terrorist squads on stand-by 24/7 to deal with any immediate threat.
Bombs are extremely hard to smuggle into Britain, and even if you get a bomb in the chances of MI5 picking up on it are very high, which is why terrorist have largely avoided targeting Britain.
We fight terrorists with everything we have got, however we don't resort to torture and acts that make us just as bad as the terrorist we are fighting.
Bin Laden was a criminal who was a mass murderer, however the IPCC ordered his indictment and ordered that he stand trial for mass murder. The USA assassinated him, and so went over the boundary of the IPCC ruling. Therefore showing it's contempt for the IPCC and other nations who worked together to brign him to justice.
England does not use torture.
Also we have anti-terrorist squads on stand-by 24/7 to deal with any immediate threat.
Bombs are extremely hard to smuggle into Britain, and even if you get a bomb in the chances of MI5 picking up on it are very high, which is why terrorist have largely avoided targeting Britain.
We fight terrorists with everything we have got, however we don't resort to torture and acts that make us just as bad as the terrorist we are fighting.
Bin Laden was a criminal who was a mass murderer, however the IPCC ordered his indictment and ordered that he stand trial for mass murder. The USA assassinated him, and so went over the boundary of the IPCC ruling. Therefore showing it's contempt for the IPCC and other nations who worked together to brign him to justice.
DeletedUser8396
Guest
First off, my situation was hypothetical, thus making your "We are defended" argument useless. IF they did succeed, what would England do?
England doesnt use torture? Read my link.
And, as for the IPCC. The US forces that killed him, went to do an extraction, not assassination. It was when the low-life grabbed a weapon and a woman as his shield and attacked us, we fired back.
DeletedUser
Guest
All the evidence points to the fact that Osama Bin Laden was unarmed and the woman ran at the Marines out of her own free will.
DeletedUser8396
Guest
What evidence? Provide proof of your claim, as I heard mine on the news and could most likely find a source when I want to (perhaps once i finish my episode)
DeletedUser
Guest
Special Investigations which covered the attack. (2 hour documentary analyzing everything).
DeletedUser8396
Guest
Any links to this? If there is enough evidence for a documentary, surely you can find something online.
DeletedUser
Guest
Watch the Documentary
Try trying in Special Investigations Bin Laded Assassination into Bing.
DeletedUser8396
Guest
lol...im not going to watch a 2 hour documentary because you cant find a link...
Perhaps we should discontinue this specific argument...considering its getting very close to conspiracy and "he said, she said"
Perhaps we should discontinue this specific argument...considering its getting very close to conspiracy and "he said, she said"
DeletedUser
Guest
Damn thought there was a slim chance you might.
That would've been hilarious.
P.S It's actually pretty good.
DeletedUser8396
Guest
lol...I hardly find documentaries interesting...
although I am liking that Ancient Aliens thing on history channel...its really good. Probably most of it is BS...but still interesting.
although I am liking that Ancient Aliens thing on history channel...its really good. Probably most of it is BS...but still interesting.
DeletedUser
Guest
DeletedUser8396
Guest
Ancient Aliens or your documentary(lol)?
DeletedUser
Guest
Errrrr, my informative film.
Btw a film comes out in October 2012 which has inside information leaked by the White House
Will be an interesting watch.DeletedUser
Guest
All this because of my video
DeletedUser
Guest
- Status